How Our Installers Get Paid Is Ridiculous

How Our Installers Get Paid Is Ridiculous

Would you go into a supermarket, leave with a trolly full of food, and then tell the cashier that you’ll pop back in a few days to pay for it? Would you book a holiday, and just before you step on the plane tell the holiday company that you’ll come back into store to pay for it once you’ve come back? If you’re buying a car outright would you drive off in the car and then come back to the dealership later on to pay for it?

The answer to all those questions is no. The answer to all those questions is that you have to pay for them all before you leave with them. So why is it then that when it comes to windows and doors, home owners are able to pay a small deposit and then are able to wait until after their windows and doors have been installed to pay their final balance.

In 2017, when pre-payment is taken for so many other things, this is ridiculous.

Outdated practise

I’ll move onto the pitfalls for installers in a moment. But take a look at other big ticket industries. Cars, kitchen, bathrooms, holidays etc. Unless you’re paying for the first three on finance, all of these sorts of big ticket purchases require the buyer to pay their full balance prior to receiving their products or going on holiday. It makes perfect sense. Why would a car dealership, who is selling a car to a customer who is buying it outright, let them drive out of the forecourt with their car without payment? They wouldn’t.

Yet, when it comes to windows and doors, installers are still only taking a deposit upon signing of contracts and only taking final payment of the balance once all the work is completed. There are so many other purchases we all make in this world, but as installers we put ourselves at such risk and disadvantage by doing it the way we do.

This form of payment method is so outdated. Consider the context of the world we live in right now. Everything is expected to be instant, whether you’re buying or selling. So against that backdrop, this archaic characteristic of our industry seems so out of place.

This isn’t the main issue though. My main issue is the severe lack of protection installers have against rogue customers.

DGB Features

No protection for installers

I feel quite strongly on this, and I will be blunt, there are more and more customers out there deliberately looking to screw companies over. It’s getting worse, and this year I feel had been particularly bad.

Over the past couple of weeks I have had private conversations with installer friends of mine who have told me of situations with their clients which have left me to believe that there is a growing number of people out there taking advantage of hard working installers, who then seek to shirk paying off their large final balances by whatever means necessary. Be it last minute snagging lists, claims of mis-information, faults where there aren’t any. In the meantime, they have a house full of new windows and doors and the installer is missing thousands of pounds in their bank account.

How is that fair? Unless it’s on finance, most window and door contracts are signed up with a deposit taken upon signature and then a final balance to be paid once the work has been completed. Some take stage payments, but even then there is a balance to pay at the end. This leaves the installer wide open to abuse from what I believe is a growing number of dishonest and rogue home owners who know exactly what the situation is and will actively try to wriggle out of paying. This is where I feel we should all be looking at how we take payment from home owners.

In a future post I am going to expand on this next point much further, but the new consumer protection laws that came into force a couple of years ago hand every bit of power over to the consumer, so much so that if a rogue customer has the inclination, time and energy to do so, makes it incredibly easy for them to abuse good, honest companies and hit them in their pockets. That is a post or two in itself, and I am going to get into the nitty gritty and the specific wording of those laws because I believe that this is going to become a very serious issue for many high quality companies. I have looked into it recently and as far as I read it, installers have pretty much no protection.

It really is time to change the way installers take payment from customers. Very few industries do it the way we do it, and for good reason. Given the often very high values that are exchanged in our own industry, doesn’t it make fiscal sense to start taking full payment up front either before the job starts or at least on the first day of the work? Some may argue that consumers need those rights and that protection against rogue companies. Well I would argue that the absolute raft of consumer laws out there right now, coupled with in-built protection with things like credit cards and finance agreements, that is less of an issue these days.

I would love to hear your experiences and thoughts on this matter. Is it getting worse out there? Do window and door installers need more protection from rogue customers? Is it time we changed the way we get paid? Please leave your comments and thoughts in the section below.

To get weekly updates from DGB sent to your inbox, enter your email address in the space below to subscribe:

By |2017-11-03T00:27:09+00:00November 3rd, 2017|Categories: double glazing industry|

Leave a Reply

5 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
DannyAnthony C Jones FIAM FInstSMM - Chairman NFGAnthony C Jones FIAM FInstSMM - Chairman - NFGSharonRod Charnick Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Very Well said I agree, we are a 5 team company based in the south and have experieced the same, We introduced a large stage payment 48 hours prior to installation, for larger contracts and new build works. The sales team were horrified but now 2 years on its standard practice, we sell this as a commintent from us to order bespoke products with a small deposit but exspect the bulk of the money in advance of installation, its been the best thing we ever did and if the client decides play the final balance game we already have the… Read more »

Brian Smith

CTSI generally consider that 50% is the maximum reasonable deposit on “bespoke” made items to comply with Unfair Terms Regs. Some years ago the OFT looked like they were going to prosecute the big DIY retailers for their 100% payment upfront terms, however this was “stayed” because of the TFO Payment Protection Scheme (but always subject to review); see weblink

Rod Charnick

You know the situation I find myself in currently Jason with a customer withholding the 75% balance of payment on a house full of windows and French Doors as she has an issue with the fact she is experiencing external and internal condensation on her highly energy efficient, air tight Liniar windows. Despite the fact it states in my contracts that this cannot be guaranteed against, and even states it is more likely to occur in the spring in autumn, I know find myself having to instruct a solicitor – which is eating into my profit margin. As I said… Read more »


Absolutely, 100% agree with post and all comments. This year it’s as if customers have all taken the same vow of let’s order our windows and doors but not pay what we agreed. I’m relatively new to the window industry (only 4 years) but totally amazes me at the payment practices and ALL companies need to start working to same the payment code so that customers can’t play us off against one another. It’s going to be an uphill structure to re-educate a country grown used to not paying until the job is done. This year, we’ve had to fight… Read more »

Anthony C Jones FIAM FInstSMM - Chairman - NFG
Anthony C Jones FIAM FInstSMM - Chairman - NFG

Thank you for bringing this problem up. It wouldn’t work asking always for 100% before delivery/installation, although I understand for large contracts, a small company would feel the need for it. It would, however, unfortunately, give the “cowboys” a great opportunity to discredit us all. What would help is a Prompt Payment Discount. The model terms of contract which the National Federation of Glaziers offers free of charge to its members, includes provision for this discount.The feedback we have is that it certainly focuses the mind of those who would delay payment! It is known as a carrot and stick… Read more »

Rod Charnick

In response to Anthony’s suggestion of offering a prompt payment discount to customers, I’d like to to ask why he thinks one should be necessary? Why should we offer a “carrot and stick” approach for getting paid what is rightfully ours? In addition to this, I believe I offer an exceptionally high level of service at a fair price and I’ll be buggered if I’m going to give away a proportion of that hard earned money in order to encourage someone to pay me! Obviously I can only speak for myself, although I know I am not alone when I… Read more »

Anthony C Jones FIAM FInstSMM - Chairman NFG
Anthony C Jones FIAM FInstSMM - Chairman NFG

Hi Rod, There is nothing stopping you increasing your prices for the exceptional service you offer and then offer a prompt payment discount. Unfortunately, we have to meet the situation where we find it. I agree that there is too much bias towards consumer rights; this has been caused by some the rogue elements in this industry using dishonest and high-pressure selling (of which I have spoken of many times in the past), not taking proper care that installations are not to a good standard and not taking above not looking after the lifeblood of every business – their customers.… Read more »


Well said, as a company we vary the payment depending on the net sum. As we all know cash flow is key to survival, something most customers do not consider. We ask a 50% deposit, 40% on the first day leaving 10% until client satisfaction, on any orders over 10K. we change this again as the order value grows. I have only had a handful of people question the amount we ask for at order stage, with a brief explanation most understand that it’s the bad payers that make companies go down this road in the first place..

Take part in the DGB Audience Survey
Click here
More in double glazing industry
Review: October 2017

Poor Customer Service And Quality Have Been The Biggest Issues Of 2017

Enough Is Enough. Time For Prosecutions

What Phoenix’s Door Panel Pull Out Says About The Industry

How Long Can 70mm Profiles Dominate?