The 240/480 Hour Salt Spray Test Is Now A Joke

The 240/480 Hour Salt Spray Test Is Now A Joke

Carrying on the hardware theme on here, and picking up from a point I made in yesterday’s post, I have come to the conclusion, as I am sure many others of you out there have, that the 240 hour salt spray test is now a total joke.

Right now, the LockLock door handle from Brisant Secure is currently making a mockery of the test, and is now nearing 6000 solid hours in the spray booth. Just consider for a moment that there are 8760 hours in a year. Is anyone willing to bet that it won’t pass that mark? If it does, then the rest of the industry has a mountain to climb to get back to level par.

But the real issue here is the test itself. 240 hours? 480 hours? Does the industry really think this is enough?

No longer fit for purpose

A lot of hardware companies boast their door hardware passing the 240 hour or 480 hour salt spray test. But throughout the years of marketing spin and hype, have we ever stopped to consider that these actually only represent just 10 or 20 days?

In an industry that gives ten year guarantees on pretty much everything as a minimum, this is an utter joke. Are we seriously saying to home owners that the rest of the door we’ve sold and fitted will be fine for at least ten years, but don’t count on the handles or letter plate? If so, then we need to take a serious look at ourselves.

Right now, there is a handle in a salt spray booth by the name of LockLock currently embarrassing the rest of the sector when it comes to corrosion resistance. I have confidence that it will pass the one year mark. And if it does, do we not think that in 2018 it’s a little bit sad that only one handle has been tested to these lengths and passed?

The reality is that anyone boasting that their hardware meets even 480 hour tests needs to cut back on the triumphalism. It’s only 20 days. Modern doors are built to last 30 years. Is it now time to revolutionise the hardware sector?

DGB Jobs

Clear demand

Ask any installer what their biggest beefs are when it comes to hardware and many of them will shout back the word: pitting. For years the installer part of the market have had to put up with shoddily made, poorly crafted handles, hinges and letter plates that pit well before the guarantee period is up. I have had two sets of handles on my door at home. I have 6 years of my warranty left. Poor.

Yet, if you ask installers if they would be prepared to pay a little bit more for door hardware if it meant that it wouldn’t pit, I am pretty sure that they would all say yes.

Think about the cost implications for installers. Even though the hardware might have a 5 or 10 year guarantee, the company still has to spend time and money for someone to go out and replace the hardware each time it fails. That then distracts the installer away from sales. All remedial work does. And worse, it novelty for the home owner of a brand new door is quickly washed away if their handles, letter plates and knockers start pitting far too quickly. These items are a big deal. They dress a door. They can make an average looking door look much better.

Then the costs go back up the supply chain, to the fabricator and ultimately the hardware supplier. But I see no need for this to happen.

The LockLock handle is physical proof that it can be done. A company can make a handle that won’t actually pit. At least not for a very long time. And it’s not even that expensive. Yes it costs a few quid extra, but when you factor it in to the overall cost of a door, it’s not prohibitively expensive, and home owner’s aren’t going to stop buying a door because of it. So, that’s a reasonably priced handle, built to last, won’t pit after 20 days and also happens to have the Sold Secured standard too. Not exactly rocket science.

I think common sense would now dictate that the people who put together the 240 and 480 hour standards need to go back to the drawing board and start to implement new standards that would force hardware companies to improve their offering. I’m thinking a new minimum of 1000 hours, with an upper level of 2000 hours. If our industry thinks it now competes at the higher end of the home improvement market, then the hardware needs to live up to those expectations. Right now they don’t. But new rules could force that improvement to happen, and we already have proof that it’s not impossible to do.

To get weekly updates from DGB sent to your inbox, enter your email address in the space below to subscribe:

By |2018-02-21T00:24:23+00:00February 21st, 2018|Categories: double glazing industry|

Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
D JonesHugh EadieKeith PaceyKevin ahern Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Kevin ahern
Kevin ahern

I think it more ridiculous that the industry offers 10 year warranties on locks and hardware to the consumer.
Does the test simulate a bunch of keys being scratched around the faceplate 6 times a day 😉

Keith Pacey

Hi DGB I am sure many volume door hardware suppliers will / are looking to improve the life of their products, the point raised to us from our customers is about the get out clauses that volume producers have, when it comes to the life of the surface finish. As an industry we need to ensure that the knowledge and information we have, from the start of the process is passed onto the door manufacturer, and then to the retailer. Between us all in the industry from suppliers, manufacturers and installers, we need to ensure the end customer is informed… Read more »

Hugh Eadie

Frankly, I’m utterly stunned that the penny has only just dropped for you. You went on about whether the industry is dishonest, well this is one of biggest examples of dishonesty. Designing a test that in itself is created to have a positive outcome, and as always in our industry, making profit is the god. Try putting one of the ‘proprietary’ cylinders in a cup of water and leave it overnight! It’s called immersion, and way more practical that the dodgy salt spray test. Only two weeks ago I asked a Senior Aluminium fabricator in Scotland for a 10 year… Read more »

D Jones
D Jones

The lock lock test is a joke, various photos have been put up on social media showing the tested handle being cleaned for promo shots etc during the test……..

Contact Info

Trending On DGB

More in double glazing industry
Brisant Secure Hint At Expanding Entire Product Range

The DGB Audience Survey

Why Window And Door Prices Won’t Be Coming Down Any Time Soon

UK Construction Week And FIT Show Issue “Promo Girl” Exhibitor Code

Letter To The Editor: Deceuninck UK MD Rob McGlennon On Colour