>
This is just a very short note on the subject of DGCOS.
Simply, if you have to constantly defend yourself from this much criticism and scepticism, you have to take a long hard look in the mirror and realise that you’ve been rejected.
The best thing to do now is to go away, analyse every part of your operation and come back refreshed, more organised, more transparent and come back with something the double glazing industry truly wants.
Simply, if you have to constantly defend yourself from this much criticism and scepticism, you have to take a long hard look in the mirror and realise that you’ve been rejected.
The best thing to do now is to go away, analyse every part of your operation and come back refreshed, more organised, more transparent and come back with something the double glazing industry truly wants.
>I really don’t think the DGCOS are as bad as everyone thinks they are. As a relatively new scheme, what kind of wally didn’t think that there would be the odd teething problem at the start? Having a sound business model is one thing, everything panning out as you’d hoped is quiet the other. Let us remember that the DGCOS will be paying for letting these companies through their vetting process with damage to their reputation and probably are under pressure from IWA as they will be coughing up a fair amount of insurance claims. I think what remains to… Read more »
>is it really the case that DGCOS "arent something the double glazing industry truly wants"? i am not sure that is the case, its more a smaller number of people on blogs/forums etc. i have just had a reference form land on my desk today from DGCOS for one of our customers who are applying to join. the applicants are a good business, who obvioulsy think it will give them a sales advantage. i hope it does, because i will benefit! they have gone through a very aggressive launch and i must admit have made a few errors but i… Read more »
>some members just havent got the brains to understand what damage they are doing by misleading the public with the whiter than white attitude, yet undermining that stance by allowing serial phonixers to become members. these offenders are giving the consumer the impression they are a fit for purpose operation with there marketing portfolios, and backed by nick ross. sadly to many people within the dg industry are to shallow to take the high horse approach as they couldnt give a damm about anyone else but themselves!!! but some of us have been around the block many times, but even… Read more »
>Robert my brains are working just fine. I would NEVER mislead the public. Both myself and my husband are very honest people. Too honest most of the time and that is reflected in our business practice. The DGCOS have only delivered what we have expected from them so far. They have greatly helped customers of non members too with free advise. Frankly I think you are completely out of order slating members of the DGCOS you clearly no nothing about. We are not all corporate theifs most of us are honest people trying to make a living.Our IBG is a… Read more »
>DGB: it's not and shouldn't be about what "the double glazing industry truly wants" – as trade bodies that's what the GGF and FENSA are for. DGCOS is about reassuring customers that they're protected if the company they're about to do business with turns out to be less secure or reliable than they'd hoped. And despite all this talk about how our industry has cleaned up its act, a quick look at a couple of the stories you've highlighted on your blog recently show that kind of things that gave us a bad reputation in the first place are still… Read more »
>The white toyota with the DGCOS logo on the rear bumper driver with phone to ear that veered over in front of me on the M56 tueday afternoon you do need to pack up and keep off the roads.By the way the car needs a good wash not a good example to you bulging customer list